Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Orthop Trauma ; 33(5): 250-255, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30633078

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with subsequent recurrent instability and to identify predictors of poor outcomes in terrible triad injury of the elbow. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-six patients who were surgically treated for terrible triad injury of the elbow. INTERVENTION: Review of charts and standardized x-ray images before surgery and 2 years after surgery. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: recurrent instability (group A) or concentric stability (group B). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Primary outcome measures were injury mechanism, time between injury and operation, fracture type, ligament injury, radial head fixation, coronoid fixation, ligament repair, period of postoperative immobilization, joint space restoration, healing progress, secondary operation, functional outcomes, and complications. Secondary outcome measures were age, sex, height, body mass index, bone mineral density, and comorbidities (hypertension and diabetes). Outcomes were measured before surgery and 2 years after surgery and were compared between groups. RESULTS: Recurrent instability occurred in 19.7% of cases; revision surgeries were performed in 12 cases (80%). High-energy trauma (P = 0.012), time between injury and operation (P = 0.001), radial head comminution (P = 0.001), medial collateral injury (P = 0.041), and coronoid nonrepair (P = 0.030) were associated with recurrent instability. Posttraumatic arthritis developed more often in group A (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent instability was associated with high-energy trauma, time between injury and operation, Mason type III radial head fracture, medial collateral injury, and coronoid nonrepair. Patients with recurrent instability were more likely to require secondary surgery and develop posttraumatic arthritis than those with concentric stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Lesões no Cotovelo , Instabilidade Articular/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Articulação do Cotovelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Cotovelo/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Instabilidade Articular/etiologia , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Recidiva , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Int Orthop ; 42(1): 1-7, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28717843

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Septic arthritis presents with good joint function, but sometimes leads to poor outcomes. Concurrent systemic sepsis has been regarded as the poor outcome, and the exact cause remains unclear. This paper was performed to identify factors associated with concurrent systemic sepsis and to research results to predict poor outcomes in patients with septic arthritis. METHODS: Laboratory and medical data were reviewed for 137 adults with acute septic arthritis who underwent open or arthroscopic surgical debridement at our institution between January 2005 and December 2014. The patients were divided according to whether they had septic arthritis alone (Group A) or in combination with systemic sepsis (Group B). Systemic sepsis was defined as two more systemic inflammatory signs in response to an infectious process. Patient characteristics, laboratory findings, synovial fluid findings and cultures, and surgical results were compared between two groups. RESULTS: Of the 137 patients, 41 (29.9%) had initial systemic sepsis at the diagnosis of septic arthritis. Independent t test revealed that duration of prodromal symptom (p = 0.012), serum neutrophil percent (p = 0.008), C-reactive protein (p = 0.001), Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.001), positive culture in synovial fluid (p = 0.001), and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolate in synovial fluid (p = 0.001) had significant correlations with the group B. Repeated debridement was performed for those who had recurrence of infection, and this procedure was more often in group B (23 versus 21 joints, 23.9 versus 51.2%, p = 0.012). Progression of arthritis occurred more often in group B (16 versus 17 joints, 16.7 versus 41.5%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Septic arthritis combined with systemic sepsis was related to duration of prodromal symptom, serum neutrophil percent, C-reactive protein, Charlson comorbidity index, positive culture in synovial fluid, and a MSSA isolate in synovial fluid. Concurrent systemic sepsis led to poor outcomes in patients with septic arthritis in terms of recurrence of infection and progression of arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Case control study.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa/complicações , Sepse/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artrite Infecciosa/cirurgia , Artroscopia/métodos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Desbridamento/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Líquido Sinovial/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...